Individual Freedom

In this new world of LEFT versus RIGHT, Liberal versus Conservative and Republican versus Democrat, I believe we need to take a step back, a pause, and consider not what makes us disagree, but what we share in common.  In many ways, I think many of us have forgotten the fundamentals of what we sometimes argue about.   In order to understand this, I think it is important to identify what ideas and concepts this country was founded upon, with a focus on the Constitution as the codification of those ideals continually refined over time by law.  It seems we can all agree that we are a nation of laws, as we have heard this slogan touted as foundational truth by both sides of the philosophical divide.

Our founders were passionate about defining and preserving those ideals and rights, so much so that they put in all in writing, addressing to the King of England their grievances, ending by pledging to each other their, ” lives, fortunes and sacred honor.”  That was no cliqued rhetoric.  Many lost their lives, fortunes, homes and farms as well as their sons in battle.

After battling the British for our freedom and then fighting each other in preserving the union, well over 1.5 million US casualties resulted, all within one-hundred years of her founding.  Based on the population then, the same percentages today would mean losing almost 25-million soldiers to war.

This was the price of freedom and this is what our forefathers thought was worth dying for:

The rejection of monarchial rule and the sanctity of Individual Liberty via a government controlled by and limited by the consent of her citizens.

The three-branches of our government check and balance each other in order to stay true to this concept.  Clearly, the importance of individual liberty underpins the entirety of the sentiment of our founders and therefore deserves our utmost diligence in preservation.  This is what Thomas Jefferson told us in his first inaugural speech.  He defined good government as, “… wise and frugal, which shall restrain men from injuring one another, which shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits”, the definition of individual liberty.

So I think it is safe to say that the preservation of individual liberty is worth dying for which also means it is worth killing for when challenged.  Jefferson reminded us of the stark reality of our collective responsibilities in this regard when he said,

“The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.”

Without the preservation of individual liberty, the foundation of our governance ceases to exist.  Remember, the founders recognized that our freedom was a natural right granted to us by God not man, but guaranteed in its preservation by government.  In other words, government doesn’t create the right to freedom, it only protects that right.  This is an extremely importance concept because if you buy into the notion that government creates liberty, then obviously government could take it away.  God given rights are eternal and no government can usurp them.  To that end, common with our founders was the reality that “when injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty”.

So, how does this close our philosophical divide?  I believe that if we acid-test every notion, every law, requirement, edict, directive, speech or philosophy against the concept of whether or not this action violates or infringes upon our shared belief in the non-negotiable principle of our individual liberty, our debates, or decisions as a nation and our governance will rebalance itself in alignment with what formed us as a nation to begin with.

Standard

Tough Love

While this is an expose’ about a town here in NY, it is a repeating theme in many areas ruled over by liberals.  If where you live is experiencing this kind of nonsense, feel free to cut-and-paste anything you see here and pepper your local newspapers and media sites with your opinion.

The radical liberals representing constituents here in Binghamton, NY are openly hostile to property owners while grossly indulgent to that faction of renters that are irresponsible deadbeats.

Instead of coddling those that are lazy, game the system, abuse drugs and live in a criminal-centric mindset, we should be encouraging property development that forces this element out of the community.

When these socialist legislators talk about “ultra-affordable” housing, they are fleecing the self-sufficient, tax-paying, honest and hard-working in order to support those who aren’t willing to be responsible, productive citizens. 

This path eventually makes Binghamton unlivable.

In the short term, the goal should be to gentrify Binghamton as quickly as possible.

In the long-term, we should be encouraging intact, traditional family structures based on a religious foundation of belief in almighty God, self-reliance, accountability, education and upward mobility.

Affecting and addressing this generational change will break the bonds of the failed liberal social-science experiment that has been proven to actually foster and promote that which it was originally thought to prevent.

This long-range objective is certainly more forward-thinking than simply indulging and furthering failure that fosters learned-helplessness and offers no solutions.

Liberals exploit those they pretend to help in order to virtue-signal and pose as their saviors.

Conservatives believe in helping people move up and out of hopelessness while liberals feel they aren’t capable.  The tough love of doing that which is hard builds people up.  The pity of liberals, cloaked as help, holds them down, cementing for them a dim future

Standard

The Art of Understanding: 

How embracing a simple concept can bring warring parties closer.

Human beings are programmed to perceive their surroundings; a natural guidance system necessary for operating in an ever-changing environment.  It is what we see, what we observe.  Our ability to perceive is an “a priori” mechanism, an instinct, hard-wired into our brains working hand-in-hand with our senses. 

Because this is a “default setting” in all of us, it is easy to over-value the assuredness of our conclusions based upon it.  Every incident that emanates from our perception is validated for accuracy by observable confirmation.  Repeated confirmations create biases that can erroneously predict outcomes weighted heavily on past experiences and not on the present.

Perception comes from the Latin word, “percepio” meaning receiving, collecting and possessing with the mind/senses.  Most of us mistakenly assign one-hundred-percent assuredness to our perceptions and this can lead to very wrong conclusions.

You’re stopped at a traffic light and the car in front of you isn’t moving although the light is green.  The drivers head is facing down and only after you use your horn does he begin to move.  As you approach the next light, the same thing happens, his head is down and he is not responding to the light turning green.  Again you use the horn, now thoroughly annoyed and sure in your thinking that the guy is texting, drunk or high.

If you had known that this man was just coming from the hospital after his wife had passed away, your perception of the events, although accurate, would have yielded you a very different conclusion.  While your rote observations were correct, your conclusion was based on too little information and too much conformational bias based on past experience and probabilities. 

What was missing here was perspective.

Many people interchange perception and perspective but the two are very different.  When these two concepts are understood and used to compliment one another, we are transformed into powerful observers with the added benefit of insight.

Perspective, in Latin:  “perspectīve ars”, the science of optics, to behold and inspect intensively, carefully.  Perspective is “Big-Picture” thinking from not only our point-of-view, but also from an observable distance.

You’re a movie actor struggling in your first Hollywood role.  The set of the movie is a single room and your role is to argue with your fellow actor.  The set is hot, you’re nervous, the director is a task-master and you get through the day not really feeling like you accomplished much.  You go home discouraged.

When the movie is finally release to the public, it is met with enthusiasm and excitement.  Your role is nominated for Best Actress and you can hardly believe it.  When you see the final product, you can hardly believe your own eyes.

While she was working, our actor’s perception was the accurate reality of hot, repetitive and frustrating work, there was no connection or validation in that moment of a greater creation.  Only after the film was edited, produced, distributed and viewed was the acclaim forthcoming.  In perspective, the whole of the parts come into focus and the earlier perception, although accurate in the moment, was not any indicator of the bigger picture.  Armed only with her perception, our actor might have quit mid-way and never realized her potential.

The tennis players on center-court at the US Open, battling each other for the championship, both super-focused and dialed in, they demonstrate perception personified.  They man in the stands watching them, sipping a beer and cheering on every great shot, he exemplifies perspective.

Adding the element of perspective to our arsenal of understanding encourages more examination, more insights, and more knowledge.  Being able to see not only the bigger picture, but those images as seen by the others involved with whatever it is you are attempting to understand, will allow you access to resources you never knew were available and make you a much more thoughtful and wiser person.  When you learn to observe the plight of others, from their point of view, and then deal with them in consideration of that understanding, you become a much more approachable and seemingly reasonable person, easier to deal with and more comfortable to be around because you took the time to see the whole situation from all perspectives and not just your own. 

You’ll know when you have successfully embraced this way of thinking and reasoning when the moment comes and you have a sudden change of heart about something you thought you knew and understood and yet you have the courage and the insight, to change your mind.

Standard

The Unspeakable Truth

Conservative ask, “What do they, (Liberals) want, what’s the end-game” when attempting to analyze their policies, practices and motives.

It is this.

Control, Revenge, Punishment, Domination.

Today’s liberals deplore personal freedom because it defies the want of their desire for oversight and control.  Preferred is a Master Plan that usurps the individuals for the greater good of the entire group.  Individual freedom is impossible to control and monitor and therefore needs to be suppressed and eliminated.  The basis for this level of control is that the over-Lords believe they are smarter than the hoards.  In their need for self-justification, liberals feel that these great unwashed masses, for their own good, need to be managed by the benevolent intelligentsia they think that they are.

Our founders were rich, white, slave-holding men and therefore have no moral authority.  This allows for the attacks on our Constitution and is essential to justify the dismantling of America.

The USA has been too white, too male, too rich, too fortunate and too dominate.  We stole this land from the Indians, we used slaves to enrich ourselves, we killed millions in Imperialist wars, marginalized women and dropped the atomic bomb on civilians.

Liberals have opened the borders and looked the other way while the gradual browning of America takes place and with it, in theory, millions of new liberal voters.  White men are vilified and systematically replaced with affirmative action candidates that represent a higher degree of importance on checking off boxes than actual competence.

Inflation, purposefully foolish monetary policy, confiscatory tax-policy, manipulated interest rates and energy policies designed to be very costly are all intended to steal our wealth.  “Fair Share” tax schemes fleece the wealthy while the Earned Income Tax Credit pays the poor back much more than they contributed.  We pay people to be lazy while strangling the producers, innovators, entrepreneurs and risk-takers with regulations, prohibitions and artificial barriers.

Once personal transportation ends, and it will if we go 100% electric, with it goes our freedom of movement.  Add to that a digitized currency and all personal freedom is gone.  Anonymity passes into history and everything you do and everywhere you go becomes data.  Once we become a part of a vast database, that data can be parsed, analyzed, manipulated sold and reorganized.

When the people who deplore personal freedom have enough data about you to know everything, you too will be manipulated.  Digital currency divulges your diet, drinking habits, whereabouts, wants and whims.  Your cell phone provides constant location monitoring and your vehicle calculates your speed, accuracy and efforts to thwart the laws of the road.  Privacy dies side-by-side with freedom and the world is a more predictable place for sure, however not a world in which I care to live.

Personal freedom is the bedrock of the fully actualized human experience and we are on a path that exchanges that necessity for the oppressive pit of damnation brought to you courtesy of the liberal notion of perfection by domination.

Standard