In this new world of LEFT versus RIGHT, Liberal versus Conservative and Republican versus Democrat, I believe we need to take a step back, a pause, and consider not what makes us disagree, but what we share in common.  In many ways, I think many of us have forgotten the fundamentals of what we sometimes argue about.   In order to understand this, I think it is important to identify what ideas and concepts this country was founded upon, with a focus on the Constitution as the codification of those ideals continually refined over time by law.  It seems we can all agree that we are a nation of laws, as we have heard this slogan touted as foundational truth by both sides of the philosophical divide.

Our founders were passionate about defining and preserving those ideals and rights, so much so that they put in all in writing, addressing to the King of England their grievances, ending by pledging to each other their, ” lives, fortunes and sacred honor.”  That was no cliqued rhetoric.  Many lost their lives, fortunes, homes and farms as well as their sons in battle.

After battling the British for our freedom and then fighting each other in preserving the union, well over 1.5 million US casualties resulted, all within one-hundred years of her founding.  Based on the population then, the same percentages today would mean losing almost 25-million soldiers to war.

This was the price of freedom and this is what our forefathers thought was worth dying for:

The rejection of monarchial rule and the sanctity of Individual Liberty via a government controlled by and limited by the consent of her citizens.

The three-branches of our government check and balance each other in order to stay true to this concept.  Clearly, the importance of individual liberty underpins the entirety of the sentiment of our founders and therefore deserves our utmost diligence in preservation.  This is what Thomas Jefferson told us in his first inaugural speech.  He defined good government as, “… wise and frugal, which shall restrain men from injuring one another, which shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits”, the definition of individual liberty.

So I think it is safe to say that the preservation of individual liberty is worth dying for which also means it is worth killing for when challenged.  Jefferson reminded us of the stark reality of our collective responsibilities in this regard when he said,

“The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.”

Without the preservation of individual liberty, the foundation of our governance ceases to exist.  Remember, the founders recognized that our freedom was a natural right granted to us by God not man, but guaranteed in its preservation by government.  In other words, government doesn’t create the right to freedom, it only protects that right.  This is an extremely importance concept because if you buy into the notion that government creates liberty, then obviously government could take it away.  God given rights are eternal and no government can usurp them.  To that end, common with our founders was the reality that “when injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty”.

So, how does this close our philosophical divide?  I believe that if we acid-test every notion, every law, requirement, edict, directive, speech or philosophy against the concept of whether or not this action violates or infringes upon our shared belief in the non-negotiable principle of our individual liberty, our debates, or decisions as a nation and our governance will rebalance itself in alignment with what formed us as a nation to begin with.