Wrong Headed

The Press & Sun-Bulletin, (P&SB) “Editorial Board”, (2 old white guys employed by Gannett), panned the recent decision to end so-called “net-neutrality”, on the shaky intellectual argument that everyone is entitled to everything the internet has to offer, delivered to all users as fast as possible.

Really?

Let’s explore how that same logic might work in the world of print journalism.

I have two daily newspapers delivered to my home, the P&SB and the Wall Street Journal, (WSJ.) I read the P&SB in the time it takes me to consume a small bowl of fruit every morning.  The WSJ takes me the rest of the day to peruse.  The P&SB costs me 50% more than my subscription to the journal.  Three things keep me subscribed to the P&SB; 1. Nostalgia, 2. Scanning the obituaries,  and 3. Learning of local news 48 hours after it happens.

Guided by the wisdom and logic of the P&SB “Editorial Board”, (2 old white guys employed by Gannett,) either the P&SB should slash it’s price by about 75%, or the WSJ should degrade its superior content and superb writing staff in order to match the low level of quality and content provided by the P&SB.

Whether it be providing internet service or newspapers, all businesses incur expenses, are motivated by profitability, and struggle naturally in a competitive business environment that ultimately requires of them the tailoring of products to a marketplace of consumers picking and choosing what they use based on their needs, their ability and their willingness to pay the price.

Similarly, consumers have choices in internet providers. Consumers who demand high speeds can pay for the service, just like all other consumers of all other types of goods and services make decisions based on quality, price and affordability.  The end of an over-reaching regulatory behemoth in government agency oversight might just result in a multi-tiered pricing structure where those consumers of digital goods who may not need wide bandwidth might enjoy a pricing discount for a slower speed.

There is larger life lesson here. If you live in the hood, have kids you can’t afford, enjoy subsidized housing, Medicaid, an EBT card and a bike instead of a car, it is with 99% probability that poor choices on your part landed you there.  That means Weis and not Wegmans, Dollar General and not Bon-Ton, Boscovs and not Brooks Brothers and finally, perhaps the public library computer terminal and not an imagined entitlement to high-speed internet.

If on the other hand, you had a good family upbringing, valued your education, stayed out of trouble, had respect for authority, a strong belief in God, self-respect, and a solid work ethic, then those conditions likely provided you the freedom to choose Wegman’s over Weis, Bon-Ton over Dollar General, Brooks Brothers over Boscov’s and computing power in the speed you can afford and need.

While true that we were all, “created equal,” there is no Constitutional or moral expectation that we necessarily stay that way. We all are defined by the choice we make, the willingness we have to work for what we want, and the desire to be responsible for our own outcomes.  Somewhere along the way, many lost the concept of personal responsibility and self-motivation, replaced instead by learned helplessness, courtesy of a liberal philosophy that devalued the family, removed shame from bad behavior, and encouraged heightened self-esteem in those who should actually be ashamed of their actions.

Standard

BGM

Build it and they will come might make for a good baseball movie and fantasy story telling, but it won’t magically make the Binghamton Regional Airport into a field of dreams.  The departure of IBM and with it, all of the ancillary businesses it supported left the Binghamton region wanting for business travelers making regular trips during the week.  Couple that with technology providing video-conferencing and real-time document sharing and costly routine business travel became largely unnecessary.

Our region, like many smaller markets throughout the US, was wooed into over-building our airports because ample federal funding had always been available to do so.  The Airport Improvement Program was to airports what the Interstate Highway system was to roadways in the later half of the 20th century.  Through that program, billions of dollars are spent every year, averaging about $5.5 million per airport.  And of course the allure was and is, free money, and if you build it they might come, and my personal favorite, if we don’t take it some other region will and we’ll be the worse for it.  Because these federal handouts were so indiscriminate, regions like Binghamton, that were shrinking markets, kept on spending thinking; what’s the downside of taking more and more federal dollars?

Fast-forward to today and this is the reality.

Not counting Binghamton, there are four commercial passenger airports within a one-hour drive, Elmira, Ithaca, Syracuse and Wilkes-Barre/Scranton.  Two offer international travel. Binghamton is not one of them.  Three of the airports are directly adjacent to interstate highways.  The Binghamton airport is 8 miles up a two-lane road.  Drawing a 25-mile radius around each of the five airports, Binghamton has the smallest population from which to draw. Syracuse has six carriers with 53 daily flights.  Wilkes-Barre/Scranton has four carriers offering 18 daily flights. Ithaca and Elmira both have three carriers and offer eight daily flights. Binghamton has a single carrier offering three fights a day, all to Detroit.

 

The same brilliant minds thinking that bringing water and sewer lines up airport road would increase airport use, now are contemplating spending thousands of dollars for a consultant to tell us what the airlines have already studied and concluded; the Binghamton market for commercial air service is insufficient to support profitability.

 

Our airport ought to lower its gate fees, landing fees, and all fees imposed on airlines, to be just a bit less than the lowest cost competitor airport within this group. Fuel costs should also be lowered to beat all of those other airports as well.  Helping carriers to lower their costs just might encourage them to offer more services here.

 

It is painfully hard to ignore the irony of the reality that the only way to fly out of Binghamton, a shrinking rust-belt region trying desperately to become a college town, is to end up in another failing region of economic despair, Detroit.

 

Standard

Cesspool

A recent news story reported that the cost to incarcerate each prisoner in NY State is over $69,000.00 annually. Taxpayer dollars spent on prisoners should never exceed the poverty rate because no inmate should be living better than the poorest amongst us.  That rate is currently just over $12,000.00 per year.

 

 

Governor Cuomo tells us that the 2019 NYS budget gap is about $4 billion dollars.

Headupass

Here is a solution. End the economic development boondoggle commonly known as the Hunger Games which is nothing more than a corrupt vote-getting scheme using taxpayer dollars and you immediately see a $1.5 billion savings.  Couple that common-sense idea with reducing prison costs to never exceed the federal poverty level and we see an additional $2.8 billion saved.

This erases the budget gap while deterring crime and ending the charade of economic development in the form of feathering the Governor’s own re-election nest.

Former federal prosecutor Preet Bharara was right when he characterized NYS as a “pay to play culture of corruption.” With more than 30 former NYS elected officials either accused, indicted, resigned, found guilty or incarcerated due to ethical misdeeds.  NYS government is not a swamp, but a cesspool.

Standard

Boy Bashing

 

Gender eradicating radical feminists are in full assault mode trying to erase “maleness” from men.

To them, masculinity is a sexually transmitted disease.

Because they know better than to attack the few real men left in this world, they instead bully little boys into growing up as ball-less buffoons, easily led, once force-fed a testosterone-free diet.

The mission of the new order Cow-Class is to socially castrate males. Keep discouraging men from being masculine fathers and that is what we will get.

Social media content creators manipulated and co-opted big business, through advertising campaigns, into propagandizing this mass emasculation. Consider insurance companies Liberty Mutual and AllState.

A Liberty Mutual TV ad celebrates young men’s inability to change a tire into a pitch for insurance that does this for them. Changing a tire used to be a rite of passage for young men learning to drive.

In the Liberty ad, the clearly expressed message is that the boy is being raised by a single mom, (no wedding rings and no dad in the picture,) while the primary message is that the boy is completely helpless.  During the entire 30-second spot, the boy looks around sheepishly, nervously glancing about and holding onto his arm with his opposite hand, while never opening his mouth, speechless in the shadow of his all-powerful Mommy doing all the talking.  Pathetic.

Our poor boys are cowed into silence, empowering women by the contact-high of scratched off testosterone found beneath their nails as the claw there way towards the feminization of American men.

Allstate ratchets it up a notch, demonstrating progress in the successful de-nutting goal. In this TV ad, the husband is shown peering into the refrigerator.  His passive-aggressive wife then denigrates and embarrasses her husband as she simultaneously pokes him in the ribs and chides him for not going to the gym enough to suit her.

Just imagine the outrage if the roles were reversed.

And finally, the 108 year-old tradition of Boy Scouting dropped the word BOY from their title, ending more than a century of proud leadership in effectively turning boys into men, precisely what the Cow-Class dreads most; independent, strong, clear-thinking men.

Men and everything that maleness stands for are under constant criticism today. The Cow-Class agenda is driven by a combination of misandrous ideology and self-loathing, stemming mainly from their own sexual insecurity and unhappiness in begrudgingly assimilating into a gender role asymmetrical with happiness and contentment.

Driven by these internal conflicts, they attack maleness because it exposes their own fragility when compared against real men’s natural self-assuredness. These tortured caricatures of women inwardly crave the possession of masculinity for themselves, while simultaneously abhorring it when packaged in men.  Unsuccessful in harnessing the power of masculinity, they instead attack genuine men because they can’t seem to establish that level of satisfaction for themselves.

The famed father of modern psychology, Sigmund Freud figured this all out 100 years ago and brilliantly reduced his findings to two words:

Penis Envy.

 

 

 

Standard

Murder in the UK

Little Alfie Evans, an English toddler just shy of his second birthday was murdered a few days ago by the British government. Any questions about the quality of care and the dignity of life under a state run system of universal health care should be clearly answered by watching the British version that murdered this baby and trampled this poor family into submission.  Alfie’s parents were worn down, threatening with arrest, and finally striped of their parental rights as they fought to save their son’s life as he suffered with a rare neurological disease.

Eager to demonstrate state power above and beyond that of life and death, the British government defiantly pissed in the eye of God Himself through the proxy of the Pope, by preventing this child from being transferred to the Vatican for care not available in Britain.  Pope Francis himself intervened, even granting Alfie citizenship in order to exercise authority over the rule of British law, to no avail.

The British government pulled the plug on Alfie rather than allow his family the right to try and save him. Those responsible for sending Alfie on his final journey might ponder their own fate when their time comes.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Standard

The Pitts

Leonard Pitts is a black, syndicated columnist whose work appears in newspapers across the country.  Mr. Pitts sees nothing but racism around every corner.  He is constantly making excuses and in large measure I ignore his rants, but several days ago, he went off on why white people are responsible for everything evil.  I sent him a copy of my Starbucks article, along with this letter which I share here:

Mr. Pitts:

Attached is my take on the Philadelphia Starbucks incident.  We surely see the world from differing perspectives.

I’m wondering, from your writings, do you ever see a moment in time, or any situation, where the black man has or takes any responsibility for his actions?  If you do, you never articulate that point, but more often find others to blame for what actually is in large measure a failed society in many ways.

Irresponsible fathers, families never formed yet children born into situations where no good role models are present is the norm in a large part of the black community.  Ironically, when those in the black community do attain success, they are mocked and ridiculed as Uncle Tom’s, especially when their success is attained traditionally and not through sports, entertainment or the thug lifestyle.  When your community celebrates the likes of Marion Berry, Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, JayZ and the thug lifestyle in general while shunning Clarence Thomas, Condoleezza Rice, Walter Williams, Colin Powell and Thomas Soule, obviously there is a problem.

Facts are stubborn things Mr. Pitts.  How do you explain 1st generation Vietnamese, Laotians, Chinese, Cambodians, et. al. coming here from foreign lands without knowing the language or culture and finding success?  The black community in the US is in large measure a failed society in spite of the opportunities laid out before them.

It’s about time the rest of society was strong enough to resist the PC pushback and simply state the obvious.  The black community’s failings are a result of their own lack of effort and their refusal to assimilate.  Quit blaming others for your own shortcomings.

 

 

Standard

An Open Letter to Starbucks

Regarding the recent situation in Philadelphia, I offer you the following facts, followed by perspective.

Starbucks locations are on private property.  Starbucks exists to be profitable.  Starbucks can set store policy, including refusing seating to non-paying loiterers.  Starbucks can prohibit the use of bathrooms to non-paying loiterers.  When non-paying loiterers are asked to leave a Starbucks and refuse, they become criminal trespassers.  When the police arrive, responding to a complaint about said trespassing, and the trespassers refuse police commands to leave, they can be rightfully arrested for trespassing.

No one disputes the allegations that these men cursed at the store manager.  No one disputes the allegation that the men yelled at and berated the police officers that were dispatched.

The loitering trespassers in this story seem to be confused about what they perceive as their “rights.”  All rights as defined in our governing documents and codified in our laws are equally applied to all in the US.  There is no “right” to unlawfully loiter on private property.  There is no “right” to use a private bathroom.  Entry to that private Starbucks is conditioned on making a purchase.  Because the loitering trespassers refused to make a purchase, they created a situation in which the management of that Starbucks asked them to leave.  The loitering trespassers created the situation for which they now claim is evidence of a racial bias.

In a civilized society, we follow basic rules of common courtesy.  When these loitering trespassers were confronted by the Starbucks manager and heard her explanation about the store policy, the civilized, normal response would have been to simply purchase a cup of coffee, or leave the premises.  Cursing at her is our first clue about the level of civility these loitering trespassers possessed.  Secondly, once the police arrived, these loitering trespassers berated them as well.  How many civilized citizens berate police and refuse their commands to the point of arrest?

This level of behavior borders on the thuggish.

Instead, in this new world we find ourselves in, turned upside down, we see the loitering trespassers having all charges dropped and their actions applauded.  We hear the police commissioner apologize for enforcing the law.  We see the Starbucks manager fired and vilified, when she should be promoted.  We see Starbucks ceremoniously closing all of their stores for half a day, in order to teach their employees how to understand their “unconscious biases.”  And finally, we hear Howard Schultz, Starbucks founder, apologizing to America.

The loitering trespassers were wrong, their arrests were valid and they should have been prosecuted.  The manager was right, the franchise was right, the policy is just.

“Unconscious bias” is the newest PC ploy used to censor.

It’s crap.

PC

Standard

Anarchy

The poet Robert Frost was right 100 years ago and it is applicable today, “Good fences make for good neighbors.”  Fences and borders define things; property lines, farm plots, ranches, malls, cities, counties, states and even whole countries.  We have fences in our yards and around our homes.  We survey our property and we define the borders of those properties with pinpoint precision.  It puzzles me why defining and defending our country’s border is so controversial when defining any other border is commonplace.

Without borders, we have no countries.  Without countries, we have no vote.  Without voting, we have no rights.  Without rights, we have no laws.  Without laws, we have no protections.  Without protections, we have no freedoms.  And without freedom, we are left with anarchy.

Open border advocates are accordingly anarchists, even if unwittingly through their own ignorance.  We claim to be a nation of laws and accordingly, laws define and provide sanctions for all of the above issues.  For those who take issue with any of this, work at changing the laws, not openly advocating for anarchy.

 

 

 

Standard

Understanding Freedom

Because we live in the greatest nation on earth, we have no idea how much of the world lives. Our citizenry has been completely shielded from the ravages of war, genocide, ethnic cleansing, or being forced to leave ones home and country behind with only the cloths on their backs.  We read about such things, or see video from our cozy homes, but we have not a clue what that feels like.

We sense no threat and many believe such atrocities could never happen here. Many are complacent, naive, lack any understanding of history and worse, have no clue about civics.

Here is a quick lesson using the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution as an example.

Many believe that the 2nd Amendment guarantees ones rights to firearms. It does no such thing.  If you read the amendment carefully, what is actually says is that the “right” itself shall not be infringed.  What the founders meant by that was actually based in their understanding of the God given right of self-defense.  18th century philosopher Emanuel Kant called such understanding a priori knowledge, or translated by American founders as without exception, absolute, no argument, a given granted by God.  With this understanding, it is a God given right that we have to self-defense.  The founders simply codified and recognized it as such and put words in place that restricted the government from interfering with that right.

God given rights are unassailable by men or governments and their words. So even though it is pleasing to me that our Constitution codifies and recognizes the enormous importance of God’s rights granted to men, I don’t need a 2nd amendment to grant to me what God has already made clear.

Our brave forefathers fought and died for our liberty and our country. Many alive today have no such memory, have known no such sorrow and pain that goes along with the efforts in defending liberty and accordingly, they believe that our tranquility, prosperity and abundance are the natural state of things.  They are not and those of us that preserve that memory and understand history share no such illusions.

Even if you removed the 2nd Amendment, the US Constitution is a completely unique document whose writers were inspired by the hand of God in its creation. Nothing like the 2nd Amendment appears in any other constitution in the world and that is because no other government in the world has been brought into existence by the very citizens it governs, with their own consent, but under constant vigilance by way of our right to control all matters of governance, up to and including abolishing the old ways for new ways as we see fit.

Thomas Jefferson reminds us that, “The tree of liberty needs to be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.” God provides us that right and the US Constitution enshrines this by recognition within the greatest document ever written by men.

Standard

Miracles

June 24, 2017 was a Saturday.  I know this because that was the day my oldest child and only son was nearly killed.  Bobby was riding his motorcycle when a car pulled out of a side street and into his path.  The quick thinking of the local mailman may have saved his life as he attended to him before the ambulance could arrive.

Taken to a nearby trauma center, Bobby was near death and in a coma.  He had a closed brain injury, broken ribs, collapsed lungs, internal injuries and many broken bones.  Several leg fractures remained open and unable to be repaired because he was so unstable.

As the days passed, Bob’s lungs were getting worse.  His ability to absorb enough oxygen to live was decreasing below survivable levels.  The decision was made to airlift him to a Level 1 trauma center because a special respirator located there was his only hope.

A few days later, a Navy surgeon took me aside and told me that I had best start preparing my ex-wife for the fact that our son was not going to make it.  He had been in a deprived oxygen state for too long.  Even if he survived all of the other medical issues, his brain was likely to be damaged badly.  He would probably never regain consciousness.

Bobby remained in a coma for just over two weeks.  He remained in the hospital for 90 some days and underwent nine surgeries.  He then spent the next thirty plus days in an in-patient, rehabilitation center and when finally discharged to go home, in a wheelchair, spent the next several months attending daily outpatient rehabilitation from eight to five where he learned to walk again, get into and out of a bed, a shower and a car.

On March 24, 2018, exactly nine months to the day, my son drove from his home in Virginia Beach to visit me here in New York.  When most people think about the term, “nine-months” they think about pregnancy and new life.  So do I.  I think about the new life God Almighty gave to my son.  I thank God for the miracle of his recovery, and the hope and inspiration it has surly provided for all who witnessed this miraculous event.

Only the power of God saved Bobby.  I hope that the hundreds and hundreds of people who prayed for him were bolstered in their own faith by becoming a real part of his salvation and hopefully, their own.

The scores of medical people who touched Bob were all doing the work of God.  Clearly the Lord has something particular in mind for this fortunate young man who has had his life handed back to him by the very object of what true perfection can only be, and than is in the person of God Almighty Himself.

As we celebrate Easter, realize the fact that Jesus died for those who believe.  This is as true and as literal for all of us, as it is literal and true for Bobby getting his life back.  Thank you Father.  All glory be to You.

Standard